The 'Too Many Options' Theory of Dating Apps Just Failed a Real Test

Photo: Good Faces Agency, via Unsplash

The paradox of choice has a paradox of its own

For years, the standard line on dating apps has been that too many options ruin everything. You've heard the version: an infinite scroll of profiles turns you into a picky, noncommittal browser who can never settle on anyone because someone theoretically better is one swipe away. It's a tidy story, borrowed from Barry Schwartz's classic "paradox of choice," and it's been repeated so often it barely gets questioned anymore.

A new study in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships questions it directly, and the results run the opposite direction.

What the researchers actually did

Junwen Hu (UC Davis) and David Markowitz ran two preregistered experiments. In the first, they split 193 single adults ages 21 to 30 into two groups. One group saw 6 dating profiles matched to their stated preferences; the other saw 31. Everyone picked one person they'd want to go on a date with, then answered questions about how motivated they felt to actually pursue that person.

The second study, with 342 active dating app users ages 18 to 35, repeated the setup with a larger sample and more refined measures, including how similar and compatible people felt to their chosen match.

People with more options wanted to pursue their pick more, not less

In both studies, the people who chose from 31 profiles reported stronger intent to pursue a relationship with the person they picked than the people who chose from just 6. The second study went further: the high-option group also reported higher general readiness to commit to a relationship, not just enthusiasm about that one match.

The researchers looked for the classic choice-overload symptoms, like people becoming pickier, more status-conscious, or more anxious about being single, and found no meaningful differences between the two groups on any of them.

What did explain the effect was compatibility. People who chose from the bigger pool felt more confident their pick was actually similar to them, and that sense of similarity is what drove the extra motivation to follow through. More options didn't make people freeze up; it let them find someone who felt like a solid fit, which made pursuing that person feel less like a gamble.

In comments on the study, the authors framed it as a flip of the usual warning: it may be scarcity, not abundance, doing the damage. Someone chosen from 31 options got more benefit of the doubt than someone chosen from 6.

Where this doesn't necessarily hold

The study has real limits worth naming. Participants viewed profiles on a static page and picked once. There was no infinite scroll, no swiping fatigue, no algorithm quietly reshuffling who shows up next, and no months of matching and unmatching in the background. Real dating app use looks a lot messier than a one-time, 31-profile lineup.

The researchers also flagged that 31 profiles may not be where overload kicks in. Comparing 6 against 300 might tell a very different story than 6 against 31. So this isn't evidence that endless swiping is good for you. It's evidence that the specific "more choice equals worse outcomes" claim doesn't hold up cleanly at the range they tested, and that the mechanism behind it (feeling like you found someone genuinely compatible) matters more than the raw number of options.

What this means if you're actually swiping

The practical takeaway isn't "swipe on everyone." It's that the anxiety many people feel about having too many matches to choose from may be less about the volume itself and more about whether any of those matches feel worth following up on. A big pool of options that don't feel compatible probably still produces the paralysis the paradox-of-choice story warns about. A big pool where you can actually spot someone who seems like a genuine fit apparently does not.

That distinction is easier to check in your own behavior than to guess at from a gut feeling. If you've ever wondered whether you're someone who racks up matches and then quietly lets most of them go cold, RizzStats' activity timeline lays out that pattern from your own Tinder or Hinge export: matches against actual conversations and follow-through, not memory.